First shots with my EOS 1D

by Wheelie

As I got too frustrated photographing from my wheelchair and not being able to approach my subjects in the distance and angle I wanted , I did quit photography for exactly ... one week ! I was so discouraged , I sold every single piece of equipment I owned and thought I'd better start a new hobby . Whilst I was boring myself more than I thought it ever possible , I noticed the significant price drop on the 1D associated with another discount of € 500 on the purchase of the body and a lens . Any Canon lens, not only a L lens. I didn't take long to convince myself this was the opportunity to get that mythical 1D I had been dreaming about since December 2001 .  Even if I know the newer , better replacement of it is just behind the corner . Maybe it will also be cheaper but I'm not the waiting type and decided to bite the bullet .

How does the 1D compare to my 10D ?

More bells and twistles . More settings . A little confusing in the beginning as the automatisms are still in place . I start to get it under control .

What seems the biggest difference is the responsiveness of the camera . Everything works faster . AF , shutter . Also , it's noisier . The mirror slap is as loud as on my old EOS 600 . Splendid !

Also , the bright and large viewfinder shows 98% of the captured image . 

The image quality is on par with it's build quality . So far , after only 300 shots and 3 days of use , I'm impressed by it's dynamic range , and the 3D impression of the images . The resized pictures shown here do not justice to the originals which just pop out the screen of my old Eizo . With 2Mp less than the 10D , the images are incredible in detail . Not the silky smoothness I was used to get with the D30/D60/10D but something harsher , more vibrant . The images rolling out of the camera are so sharp and colorful . This is due to a much less aggressive AA filter . In countrepart , I find some banding in underexposed pics ( my fault ! ) and strange patterns on roofs , brick walls , grilles where the frequency of the pixel pitch clashes with the frequency of the lines  of those subjects ( thank you , Adam-T for explaining this ) .

The banding issue , although well-known , is rather disapointing . Even at ISO 200 , I get banding in the underexposed areas .

Well , I guess I will need Fred Miranda's ISOR-BR Pro action to minimize this unwanted characteristic ...

Update : I used every available noise reduction software ( except NoiseNinja ) and ther's no cure . At least for me .

After 2500 shots and much testing and humility , I start to understand where to do the light metering for every single shot in order to avoid the banding . I need to forget my Ektachrome days and find the right compromise between the hig-and low lights . Metering for the high lights is looking for trouble and , as the dynamic range is much wider than on the previous Canon dslr's I used so far , the problem can be ( almost ) easily cured .

On the other hand , the L ( ISO 100 ) setting allows unexpectedly clean pictures . At least in flat light conditions .

Canon claims the dynamic range is not as good as at ISO 200 but , this , I need some bright sun to test . 

I won't bash the 10D here . It's certainly better for landscapes where it will give more detail . It will , also , produce larger prints . It's a great all-round performer for which I had no complaints at all .

Do I regret my ' upgrade ' ? No . At least , not so far . I'm so much impressed about how my 1D works , I already know we are going to be a great team . Even , if it's performance will always be greater than mine .

Conclusion : To cover all aspects of photography , the 1D alone will not fill the bill . I'm plenty happy with my 1D for people photography , candids , sports . For those who want to photography landscapes , weddings ( large groups ) , high ISO noise and banding free shots , wildlife where serious cropping is needed , I consider a 10D will be a perfect partner to the 1D . Or the 1Ds for the more wealthy .... except for the high ISO's ...

Also , new and/or novice happy owners shouldn't hesitate to accept a rather long training curve to be able to get the quintescence out of this historical benchmark of dslr's . When I look to my 13x19' prints , I know I started a looooonnng love affair with my 1D ... 

Update : Despite it's brilliant performance , the 1D didn't convince me after 3000 shots . I very regretfully sold it because of the noise and banding that I was not able to keep under control , let alone avoid even at low ISO's . It was a real heartache to part with it but I missed the clean files of my 10D . So , a new sample of that camera takes care of my photography ..... 

Raw 16bit non linear conversion with BreezeBrowser

00076_RT16FVU.jpg (117877 octets) 00079_RT16FVU.jpg (99861 octets) 753F0146_16_403_A_A2_f_200.jpg (143562 octets) 753F0212_16_403_A_A2_f_200.jpg (79741 octets) 753F0166_16_403_A_A2_f_200.jpg (178629 octets)
753F0154_16_403_A_A2_f_200.jpg (140000 octets) 753F0197_16_403_A_A2_f_200.jpg (133073 octets)

00089_RT16FVU.jpg (90627 octets)

753F0163_16_403_A_A2_f_200.jpg (160148 octets)

00095_RT16FVU.jpg (68220 octets)

753F0123.jpg (135928 octets)

753F0139_16_403_A_A2_f_200.jpg (117828 octets)

753F0142_16_403_A_A2_f_200.jpg (176323 octets)

753F0170_16_403_A_A2_f_200.jpg (165645 octets)

753F0225_16_403_A_A2_f_200.jpg (148522 octets)

RAW 16 bits Linear Conversion with FVU

Raw 16bits Linear conversion is easy and straightforward with the help the FVU and Larry Lueck's curves .

The Raw files are converted as described here : RAW processing for Canon 1Ds using Canon File Viewer Utility.

For the pictures below , I applied the ' Bright'  curve and tweakened them further with Levels in PS .

An USM of 150 - 0.5 - 2 was applied .

Converted to Tif 8bits and to Jpeg .

They were resized to 1000x669 pixels and 50% for web publishing .

ISO 200

00112_RT16.jpg (153314 octets)

00097_RT16.jpg (116420 octets)

00106_RT16.jpg (198121 octets) 00105_RT16.jpg (148624 octets) 00101_RT16.jpg (111906 octets)
00098_RT16.jpg (158943 octets)

00117_RT16.jpg (97302 octets)

00102_RT16.jpg (118335 octets)

00103_RT16.jpg (112728 octets)

00108_RT16.jpg (169656 octets)

00115_RT16.jpg (136359 octets)

00116_RT16.jpg (91834 octets)

00100_RT16.jpg (133801 octets)

00119_RT16.jpg (152241 octets)

00099_RT16.jpg (116623 octets)

ISO 400

Resize of 753F10500.jpg (108185 octets)

Resize of 753F10479.jpg (149160 octets)

Resize of 753F10485.jpg (152331 octets)

Resize of 753F10480.jpg (177839 octets)

Resize of 753F11493.jpg (104682 octets)

ISO 1600 - All shots in low light conditions , hence Neat Image came to the rescue...

Resize of 753F0530_filtered.jpg (95404 octets)

Resize of 753F0538_filtered.jpg (91223 octets)

Resize of 753F0523_filtered.jpg (95916 octets)

Resize of 753F0549_filtered.jpg (72115 octets)

Resize of 753F0552_filtered.jpg (186468 octets)

ISO 3200 - ISO 6400

00127_RT16.jpg (87307 octets)  

00134_RT16.jpg (87627 octets)

 

00156_RT16.jpg (86746 octets)

ISO 100 - Amazingly good results in flat light conditions 

0025_IMG.jpg (78226 octets)

0013_IMG.jpg (74278 octets)

0033_IMG.jpg (144410 octets)

0029_IMG.jpg (72774 octets)

0038_IMG.jpg (152176 octets)
  0032_IMG.jpg (126413 octets)

0034_IMG.jpg (128365 octets)

0036_IMG.jpg (161442 octets)  

Interpolations  ( Warning : large files ! )

Resize of interpolated2.jpg (222580 octets) Crops2.jpg (327840 octets)

Original  file : RAW 16bit Linear

Interpolation : PS Bicubic 40x60cm at 250dpi ( 3937x 5886 ) 68Mb

Editing : Noise reduction

USM : I applied twice  150 - 0,5 - 2

The files shown were transformed to Jpeg and reduced at 50%

The crop is a 100% of the Tif at 40x60cm

     
Resize of interpolation4.jpg (325527 octets)

Crops1.jpg (212771 octets)

Original file : Raw 16bit Linear

Interpolation : PS Bicubic 60x80cm at 250dpi ( 5722x8555 ) 143.3Mb

Editing : Noise reduction

USM : I applied twice 150 - 0,5 - 2

The files shown were transformed to Jpeg and reduced at 50%

The crop is a 100% of the Tif at 60x80cm

0032_IMGlarge.jpg (348566 octets) 0032_IMGlargecrop.jpg (229016 octets)

 

For this one , I used another method , as described here :

Image Resizing

I started with an already edited Tif file in 8bits .

The image was upsampled in PS at 800% using ' Nearest Neighbour ' and not ' Bicubic ' !

The upsampled image was given a Gaussian Blur of 4 pixels .

Finally, an Unsharp Mask with Amount=100%, Radius=8 pixels) and Threshold=0.

This brought the file size to 761Mb ....

I downsampled to 24x36 ' ( 60x90cm ) using PS' bicubic .

The new file is now 221.5Mb .

The pics shown here were converted to Jpeg and resized .

The crop is 100% of the 221Mb Jpeg.